Usluge AI integracije
Ne morate sve graditi ispočetka. Ugrađujemo AI u Vaše postojeće sustave kako biste ostvarili rezultate bez prekida u radu.
Usluge integracije
API integracija
Povežite AI usluge sa svojim aplikacijama putem čistih, dobro dokumentiranih API-ja. Kompatibilno s bilo kojim tehnološkim stackom.
Modernizacija naslijeđenih sustava
Dodajte AI mogućnosti starijim sustavima bez potpunog prepisivanja. Gradimo mostove, ne zidove.
Automatizacija procesa
Automatizirajte ponavljajuće zadatke inteligentnim cjevovodima. Smanjite ručni rad i ljudske pogreške.
Postavljanje podatkovnih cjevovoda
Izgradite podatkovnu infrastrukturu koju AI zahtijeva - prikupljanje, čišćenje, pohrana i obrada u stvarnom vremenu.
Kako integriramo
Revizija postojećih sustava
Razumijevanje vaše trenutne arhitekture, tokova podataka i ograničenja.Razumijevanje Vaše trenutne arhitekture, tokova podataka i ograničenja.
Dizajn točaka integracije
Identificiranje gdje AI dodaje vrijednost uz minimalne smetnje.
Inkrementalna izgradnja i testiranje
Postupno uvođenje s temeljitim testiranjem u svakom koraku.
Nadzor i optimizacija
Kontinuirani nadzor osigurava glatki rad nakon pokretanja.
Tipičan vremenski okvir
4-12 tjedana ovisno o složenosti sustava.
What does it take to integrate AI into systems already in production?
Integrating AI into a running system is mostly not a modelling problem. It is a question of where inference runs, what latency the workflow tolerates, which system the output lands in, what happens when the service is unavailable, and who is paged when it breaks. A model that answers correctly in eight seconds is useless at a workstation and fine in a nightly batch, and nothing about the model tells you which case you are in.
The work therefore starts from the target system rather than the model: its interfaces, its release process, its security review, and the person who owns it. Most integrations that fail did so because that person was not involved until the end.
Adoption is the other half. If a human has to copy a result from one screen into another, usage decays to zero regardless of accuracy, so the output has to arrive where the work already happens.
Za koga je ovo
- Companies with a chosen model or vendor and no path into their stack.
- Brownfield estates where the target system predates the API era.
- Teams whose pilot worked in isolation and stalled at deployment.
- Businesses needing AI output inside an ERP, MES, CRM or case system.
What we need from you
- Access to the target system and a test environment.
- Whoever owns that system, involved from the first week.
- The real latency and volume requirement, taken from the workflow.
- Your security review process, started early rather than late.
What you get back
- A working integration into the system people already use.
- A defined fallback for when the model is unavailable or unsure.
- Monitoring and alerting tied to the workflow, not just uptime.
- A runbook naming who does what when it misbehaves.
- Load and latency evidence against the real requirement.
What a typical engagement looks like
Inference into an ERP or MES
Wiring model output into the system of record so an operator sees it in place, with the fallback path defined before go-live rather than discovered during an outage.
Replacing a manual handoff
Where a person currently moves data between two systems, the integration removes the handoff entirely, which is usually where the measurable saving actually comes from.
Vendor model, your environment
Deploying a third-party model inside your boundary for residency or latency reasons, including the security review and the operational handover.
Regulatory and data constraints
Where inference runs is a compliance decision as much as an engineering one. Data residency, the acceptable vendor list and the GDPR position on transfers all constrain the architecture, and retrofitting residency onto a system built against a foreign-hosted API generally means rebuilding it.
Security review is routinely the longest pole and is entirely predictable. Starting it in week one rather than at go-live is the single change that most reliably shortens an integration timeline.
Frequently asked questions
Agents across existing systems
Where a workflow spans several systems and breaks on exceptions, a goal-driven agent copes better than a fixed integration script. It also needs different guardrails.
How Hermes Agents optimise business operationsSpremni za početak?
Rezervirajte besplatnu konzultaciju za razgovor o Vašem AI projektu.